Where do i find information about dog bites and dog attacks. Like the statisics for which breeds bite the most, which breeds cause the most fatal attacks, and how many dog attacks happen per year. I have been searching online, but i just can't seem to find what i'm looking for. I see people throw out statistics, but they are all different, so i want to find for myself the real statistics. Does anyone know where i can find this information?
Where can i find dog attack statistics?
Hi!!
Please look:
- CDC statistics http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm4621.pd...
- Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998 - http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds....
also look:
- Nonfatal Dog Bite--Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments --- United States, 2001 - http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml...
Jason Homan
Reply:Don't believe stats, most bites are unreported because they happen within families or to people known to the dogs family.
If you contact the local health department or animal control in your area they probably maintain their own records and might be able to help.
I would like to add that since most people can't identify dog breeds and there are so many mutts out there; dividing on the basis of breed makes little sense. Really what others have said is true, all dogs can bite.
I have been bit by 3 dogs and my dogs have been bit and it was always a breed that was supposed to be nice and not bite.
Reply:http://www.dogbitelaw.com/PAGES/statisti...
This not only gives statistics but breaks it down between dogs, vicitims, fatalities, and gives comparisons to other injuries.
Reply:http://www.dogbitelaw.com/Dog%20Attacks%...
Here is a pdf link to a site that has statistics on various breeds and details about some of the bites (i.e. provoked, etc...).
Reply:If you want to find actual statistics, like numbers, I can't help you with that. I'm not sure why you want to know this information. If you're trying to find a good dog for your kids/family, then try AKC.org, or google "best dog for me." Understand that ALL dogs can bite, and most WILL bite when pushed too far by a curious infant, or abusive owner. But if you're looking for the info to maintain your argument for or against laws, or for a report, I just googled "dog bite statistics" and came up with some good stuff.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
What are the statistics for marriage, divorce and unmarried couples living together in Germany?
I need to make comparisons between one year and a more recent year, eg 1996 and 2006 for couples in Germany, whether they have children, whether they are married, whether they have been divorced.... and I can't find anything helpful online! Do any of you happen to know any of these statistics?
What are the statistics for marriage, divorce and unmarried couples living together in Germany?
I read an article about marriage in Germany not long ago; I think it might have been from the AP (and, thus, available at many newspaper websites, etc). It seems they have a high percentage if couples who live together without getting married and a large number of women who specifically choose not to have children--something like 1/3 of women in Germany do not have kids.
Reply:they find it inmature it is unexceptable .. !! LOL .. but today theie doing it because of the american's living there they adapt to the culture/ way of being
What are the statistics for marriage, divorce and unmarried couples living together in Germany?
I read an article about marriage in Germany not long ago; I think it might have been from the AP (and, thus, available at many newspaper websites, etc). It seems they have a high percentage if couples who live together without getting married and a large number of women who specifically choose not to have children--something like 1/3 of women in Germany do not have kids.
Reply:they find it inmature it is unexceptable .. !! LOL .. but today theie doing it because of the american's living there they adapt to the culture/ way of being
Where and how can I get an entry level statistics job in Southern California?
I have a Master's degree in psychology and have taken almost 2 years of statistics. I would like an entry level position but all the job openings I find seem to be in market research.
Where and how can I get an entry level statistics job in Southern California?
First and most obvious is a government statistician post.
Not so obvious is in pharmaceuticals - clinical trials and associated research demand data-aware professionals with good knowledge and an understanding of stats.
Another area is in education - the companies and or agencies who develop standardised tests and exams, not just psychometric instruments but school examinations.
There are also many many jobs in the financial services sector which may *sound* like market research positions but are actually very stats intensive with real job output.
Reply:haveyou tried the public school system? Some systems have programs that they need evaluated and they collected a lot of data that needs to be analyzed.
Pharmaceutical companies too.
broken teeth
Where and how can I get an entry level statistics job in Southern California?
First and most obvious is a government statistician post.
Not so obvious is in pharmaceuticals - clinical trials and associated research demand data-aware professionals with good knowledge and an understanding of stats.
Another area is in education - the companies and or agencies who develop standardised tests and exams, not just psychometric instruments but school examinations.
There are also many many jobs in the financial services sector which may *sound* like market research positions but are actually very stats intensive with real job output.
Reply:haveyou tried the public school system? Some systems have programs that they need evaluated and they collected a lot of data that needs to be analyzed.
Pharmaceutical companies too.
broken teeth
Any information or statistics about make make, and what happened to ceres after they made the plutoid family?
any vital statistics about makemake, diameter, orbital period, speed, rotation period, mass, volume,ECT.
and if ceres is not part of the plutoid group did that mean they demoted it AGAIN? or is it still a dwarf planet? i sure hope it is still a dwarf planet, i liked ceres.
Any information or statistics about make make, and what happened to ceres after they made the plutoid family?
The Makemake wiki page has grown into a great resource now, so I will provide a link instead of cutting/pasting into this answer. All of Makemakes' orbital and physical characteristics are shown on that page, as well as a visual comparison to other members of the solar system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makemake_%2...
As for Ceres, it is still a Dwarf Planet because being a member of the Plutoid family is not a requirement to be a Dwarf Planet. Lots of info on the (currently) four Dwarf Planets here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_plane...
Hope that answers your question!
Reply:I like it too. Heres what I found on the web:Ceres was named after the Roman goddess of the harvest, of growing plants, and motherly love. It is the smallest of the dwarf planets, a new category of astronomical bodies created by the International Astronomical Union in 2006. Dwarf planets currently includes Pluto, Eris, and Ceres.. Pluto's demotion from the list of solar system planets grabbed front-page headlines in 2006. But the debate over the qualifications for planethood reaches back to the discovery of Ceres.
Discovery and Classification
Ceres was discovered on January 1, 1801 by astronomer Giuseppe Piazzi, a monk in Sicily and the founding director of the Palermo Astronomical Observatory. Ceres was found within a gap between Mars and Jupiter where a planet was expected to reside, based on the spacing of the known planets in the solar system. Known as the Titius-Bode Law, this prediction was named for the astronomers who had noticed in the 1760s and 1770s that the relative distances of the six known planets from the Sun fit a mathematical relationship. Although it is called a "law," it has no basis in physics.
According to Titius-Bode, a planet should exist between Mars and Jupiter. Astronomers had been hunting for this phantom planet since Uranus was discovered in 1781. Uranus, too, was at just the distance where the law predicted a planet should be.
Nestled between Mars and Jupiter, Ceres was in just the right spot. So astronomers called it a planet. Piazzi initially named the new planet Ceres Ferdinandea after the Roman goddess of the harvest and King Ferdinand IV of Naples and Sicily. Ferdinandea, however, was later dropped.
Ceres's discovery was just the beginning of a landslide of small bodies spotted between Mars and Jupiter. A year after Ceres was discovered, astronomers found another body between the two planets that was almost as bright as Ceres. Heinrich Olbers unexpectedly found the second body, which he called Pallas after Pallas Athena, an alternate name for the goddess Athena.
Many astronomers realized that neither Ceres nor Pallas fit the conventional idea of a planet because their disks were so small they could only be resolved through telescopes. Because of their star-like appearance, Sir William Herschel coined the term "asteroid" for such bodies, writing in 1802: "They resemble small stars so much as hardly to be distinguished from them, even by very good telescopes." Herschel, therefore, argued that Ceres and Pallas were different from other planets.
Most other astronomers, however, disagreed. These two new additions to the solar system were listed with the rest of the planets.
The rush of small bodies continued to pile up. Astronomers nabbed Juno in 1804 and Vesta in 1807. The growing list of small objects raised concern that the asteroids were debris from a planet that had somehow disintegrated. Nevertheless, Juno and Vesta joined Ceres and Pallas as planets.
By the 1820s, astronomers counted 11 planets in the solar system. Introductory astronomy texts of that time listed the planets as Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Vesta, Juno, Ceres, Pallas, Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus.
Astronomers found another body, Astraea, near the end of 1845, almost 39 years after Vesta was spied. Three new objects were spotted in 1847. By the end of 1851, there were 15 known bodies between Mars and Jupiter.
Finally, astronomers realized that this large number of similar bodies all in orbit between Mars and Jupiter represented a new class of solar-system object. They called them asteroids, the name Herschel had coined 50 years earlier. Instead of listing them by distance from the Sun, as they did the planets, astronomers categorized them by their order of discovery. Astronomers today list about 100,000 known asteroids as large as 6 miles (10 kilometers) across located between Mars and Jupiter, a region now called the asteroid belt.
So Pluto's dismissal from the planetary ranks is not unique. Ceres, Vesta, and the other asteroids found in the 1800s, suffered the same indignity. In fact, their stories are similar. Astronomers began to question the planethood of Ceres, Vesta, and the other asteroids as they spotted more objects in the same region. Likewise, Pluto's planetary pedigree was put to the test when astronomers began finding other icy rocks in the planet's neighborhood, a region now called the Kuiper belt. In fact, one of the objects discovered, Eris, is even larger than Pluto. Ceres, Vesta, and Pluto also are among the most massive bodies in their respective regions, the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt.
In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) attempted to settle the ongoing debate by adopting a new planet definition. One proposal would have defined a planet as "a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (b) is in orbit around a star, and is neither a star nor a satellite of a planet". If this proposal had been adopted, Ceres would have become the fifth planet in order from the Sun. Because of some of the complications this proposal would have caused, it was not accepted. Instead an alternative definition came into effect which defined a "planet" as "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit." The newly adopted definition was bad news for Pluto but good news for Ceres. Pluto was demoted to a category called dwarf planets, and Ceres was promoted to the same category. Dwarf planets share some, but not all, of a planet's characteristics. Both bodies are round like planets but do not clear out their orbits of debris.
The long debate on the definition of a planet is a textbook example of how scientific concepts are not etched in stone but continue to evolve with new discoveries.
Physical Characteristics
With a diameter of about 975x909 km, Ceres is by far the largest and most massive (9.5 x1020 kg) body in the asteroid belt, and contains approximately a third of the mass (0.2 x1021 kg) of all the asteroids in the solar system. However, it is not the largest solar system object besides the Sun, planets, and their moons. Larger bodies have been found in the Kuiper belt including Pluto, 50000 Quaoar, 90482 Orcus, 90377 Sedna, and Eris. Recent observations have revealed that Ceres is nearly spherical in shape, unlike the irregular shapes of smaller bodies with less gravity. Having sufficient mass for self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces is one of the requirements for classification as a planet or dwarf planet.
German mathematician Karl Friedrich Gauss calculated from Piazzi's few observations that Ceres circled around the Sun once every 4.6 years or about 4 years, 220 days. Its true sidereal period is 1679.819 days. Ceres has a very small axial tilt of 4±5 degrees.
Ceres has a very primitive surface and like a young planet, contains water-bearing minerals, and possibly a very weak atmosphere and frost. Infrared observations show that the surface is warm with a possible maximum temperature of 235 K (-38°C). Ceres ranges in its visual brightness magnitude from +6.9 to +9.. At its brightest point it is just barely too dim to be seen with the naked eye.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope observed that Ceres' surface has a large dark spot as well as a bright spot which are presumed to be crates. A second explanation for the dark spot it that it may be a darker substance in the asteroid's soil. Studies have shown that Ceres probably has a differentiated interior with a rocky core, an icy mantle that is betwee 60 to 120 km thick, and a thin dusty surface.
More will be know about Ceres when the Dawn spacecraft visits the dwarf planet in 2015. The Dawn mission is set for launch in September 2007. It will explore asteroid 4 Vesta in 2011 before arriving at Ceres
and if ceres is not part of the plutoid group did that mean they demoted it AGAIN? or is it still a dwarf planet? i sure hope it is still a dwarf planet, i liked ceres.
Any information or statistics about make make, and what happened to ceres after they made the plutoid family?
The Makemake wiki page has grown into a great resource now, so I will provide a link instead of cutting/pasting into this answer. All of Makemakes' orbital and physical characteristics are shown on that page, as well as a visual comparison to other members of the solar system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makemake_%2...
As for Ceres, it is still a Dwarf Planet because being a member of the Plutoid family is not a requirement to be a Dwarf Planet. Lots of info on the (currently) four Dwarf Planets here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_plane...
Hope that answers your question!
Reply:I like it too. Heres what I found on the web:Ceres was named after the Roman goddess of the harvest, of growing plants, and motherly love. It is the smallest of the dwarf planets, a new category of astronomical bodies created by the International Astronomical Union in 2006. Dwarf planets currently includes Pluto, Eris, and Ceres.. Pluto's demotion from the list of solar system planets grabbed front-page headlines in 2006. But the debate over the qualifications for planethood reaches back to the discovery of Ceres.
Discovery and Classification
Ceres was discovered on January 1, 1801 by astronomer Giuseppe Piazzi, a monk in Sicily and the founding director of the Palermo Astronomical Observatory. Ceres was found within a gap between Mars and Jupiter where a planet was expected to reside, based on the spacing of the known planets in the solar system. Known as the Titius-Bode Law, this prediction was named for the astronomers who had noticed in the 1760s and 1770s that the relative distances of the six known planets from the Sun fit a mathematical relationship. Although it is called a "law," it has no basis in physics.
According to Titius-Bode, a planet should exist between Mars and Jupiter. Astronomers had been hunting for this phantom planet since Uranus was discovered in 1781. Uranus, too, was at just the distance where the law predicted a planet should be.
Nestled between Mars and Jupiter, Ceres was in just the right spot. So astronomers called it a planet. Piazzi initially named the new planet Ceres Ferdinandea after the Roman goddess of the harvest and King Ferdinand IV of Naples and Sicily. Ferdinandea, however, was later dropped.
Ceres's discovery was just the beginning of a landslide of small bodies spotted between Mars and Jupiter. A year after Ceres was discovered, astronomers found another body between the two planets that was almost as bright as Ceres. Heinrich Olbers unexpectedly found the second body, which he called Pallas after Pallas Athena, an alternate name for the goddess Athena.
Many astronomers realized that neither Ceres nor Pallas fit the conventional idea of a planet because their disks were so small they could only be resolved through telescopes. Because of their star-like appearance, Sir William Herschel coined the term "asteroid" for such bodies, writing in 1802: "They resemble small stars so much as hardly to be distinguished from them, even by very good telescopes." Herschel, therefore, argued that Ceres and Pallas were different from other planets.
Most other astronomers, however, disagreed. These two new additions to the solar system were listed with the rest of the planets.
The rush of small bodies continued to pile up. Astronomers nabbed Juno in 1804 and Vesta in 1807. The growing list of small objects raised concern that the asteroids were debris from a planet that had somehow disintegrated. Nevertheless, Juno and Vesta joined Ceres and Pallas as planets.
By the 1820s, astronomers counted 11 planets in the solar system. Introductory astronomy texts of that time listed the planets as Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Vesta, Juno, Ceres, Pallas, Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus.
Astronomers found another body, Astraea, near the end of 1845, almost 39 years after Vesta was spied. Three new objects were spotted in 1847. By the end of 1851, there were 15 known bodies between Mars and Jupiter.
Finally, astronomers realized that this large number of similar bodies all in orbit between Mars and Jupiter represented a new class of solar-system object. They called them asteroids, the name Herschel had coined 50 years earlier. Instead of listing them by distance from the Sun, as they did the planets, astronomers categorized them by their order of discovery. Astronomers today list about 100,000 known asteroids as large as 6 miles (10 kilometers) across located between Mars and Jupiter, a region now called the asteroid belt.
So Pluto's dismissal from the planetary ranks is not unique. Ceres, Vesta, and the other asteroids found in the 1800s, suffered the same indignity. In fact, their stories are similar. Astronomers began to question the planethood of Ceres, Vesta, and the other asteroids as they spotted more objects in the same region. Likewise, Pluto's planetary pedigree was put to the test when astronomers began finding other icy rocks in the planet's neighborhood, a region now called the Kuiper belt. In fact, one of the objects discovered, Eris, is even larger than Pluto. Ceres, Vesta, and Pluto also are among the most massive bodies in their respective regions, the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt.
In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) attempted to settle the ongoing debate by adopting a new planet definition. One proposal would have defined a planet as "a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (b) is in orbit around a star, and is neither a star nor a satellite of a planet". If this proposal had been adopted, Ceres would have become the fifth planet in order from the Sun. Because of some of the complications this proposal would have caused, it was not accepted. Instead an alternative definition came into effect which defined a "planet" as "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit." The newly adopted definition was bad news for Pluto but good news for Ceres. Pluto was demoted to a category called dwarf planets, and Ceres was promoted to the same category. Dwarf planets share some, but not all, of a planet's characteristics. Both bodies are round like planets but do not clear out their orbits of debris.
The long debate on the definition of a planet is a textbook example of how scientific concepts are not etched in stone but continue to evolve with new discoveries.
Physical Characteristics
With a diameter of about 975x909 km, Ceres is by far the largest and most massive (9.5 x1020 kg) body in the asteroid belt, and contains approximately a third of the mass (0.2 x1021 kg) of all the asteroids in the solar system. However, it is not the largest solar system object besides the Sun, planets, and their moons. Larger bodies have been found in the Kuiper belt including Pluto, 50000 Quaoar, 90482 Orcus, 90377 Sedna, and Eris. Recent observations have revealed that Ceres is nearly spherical in shape, unlike the irregular shapes of smaller bodies with less gravity. Having sufficient mass for self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces is one of the requirements for classification as a planet or dwarf planet.
German mathematician Karl Friedrich Gauss calculated from Piazzi's few observations that Ceres circled around the Sun once every 4.6 years or about 4 years, 220 days. Its true sidereal period is 1679.819 days. Ceres has a very small axial tilt of 4±5 degrees.
Ceres has a very primitive surface and like a young planet, contains water-bearing minerals, and possibly a very weak atmosphere and frost. Infrared observations show that the surface is warm with a possible maximum temperature of 235 K (-38°C). Ceres ranges in its visual brightness magnitude from +6.9 to +9.. At its brightest point it is just barely too dim to be seen with the naked eye.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope observed that Ceres' surface has a large dark spot as well as a bright spot which are presumed to be crates. A second explanation for the dark spot it that it may be a darker substance in the asteroid's soil. Studies have shown that Ceres probably has a differentiated interior with a rocky core, an icy mantle that is betwee 60 to 120 km thick, and a thin dusty surface.
More will be know about Ceres when the Dawn spacecraft visits the dwarf planet in 2015. The Dawn mission is set for launch in September 2007. It will explore asteroid 4 Vesta in 2011 before arriving at Ceres
What are some statistics about how tourism affects local businesses?
I would assume that toursim impacts local economy by creating jobs and bringing tourism dollars into the community. Do you know any statistics or good information sources regarding this?
What are some statistics about how tourism affects local businesses?
Tourism is down by 70 percent this year (for the month of April, 2006) compared to last year's figures, and thusly, revenue for my hotel is down by 68 percent. Very relative, don't you think?
What are some statistics about how tourism affects local businesses?
Tourism is down by 70 percent this year (for the month of April, 2006) compared to last year's figures, and thusly, revenue for my hotel is down by 68 percent. Very relative, don't you think?
How are undocumented workers accounted for in unemployment statistics?
Since undocumented workers and those employed in illegal activites contribute to aggregate output(real gdp) is there an official way to measure their output or their contribution to statistics such as the unemployment rate?
How are undocumented workers accounted for in unemployment statistics?
they are not accounted for
Reply:The fact that they are undocumented should answer your questions. If they are here illegally then no taxes, social security,
or anything else is taken out. They do not file tax returns nor
does the people who hire illegals admit to hiring them. I don't believe there is any way to make any official statistic concerning
their contributions.
Reply:No. Unemployment statistics depend a great deal on counting people who have applied for unemployment benefits and are looking for work through that department. (That's why the figures can't really be trusted; they don't count people who have just given up.)
How are undocumented workers accounted for in unemployment statistics?
they are not accounted for
Reply:The fact that they are undocumented should answer your questions. If they are here illegally then no taxes, social security,
or anything else is taken out. They do not file tax returns nor
does the people who hire illegals admit to hiring them. I don't believe there is any way to make any official statistic concerning
their contributions.
Reply:No. Unemployment statistics depend a great deal on counting people who have applied for unemployment benefits and are looking for work through that department. (That's why the figures can't really be trusted; they don't count people who have just given up.)
According to statistics, is the welfare system working or is fraud still prevalent?
I am looking for welfare statistics to find out if the system is working or if there are still a large amount of fraud cases.
According to statistics, is the welfare system working or is fraud still prevalent?
Illegal immigrants are the biggest recipients of our welfare fraud problem.
Reply:I found a couple websites you might enjoy reading that are listed below. Here is a quote from one of the below websites:
"Eighteen states had not been keeping statistics on child care fraud, but of them, several responded that the local county agencies administering the services did maintained fraud databases. In those states that did maintain detailed statistics, fraud was discovered in upwards of 69 percent of the investigations conducted with total annual discovered fraud amounts ranging from $10,000 to over $1 million." -UCOWF
Reply:The current welfare/SS/unemployment/medicare/medicad... make up 67% of the Federal governments total spending. If you take into consideration that the Fed recieves about 3.5 trillion in tax revenues a year then 2.34 trillion dollars goes into social assistance programs. (2,340,000,000,000 dollars) if only lets say that on the low end 10% of the total is fraudulent or misused then that is 234 billion dollars that is being stolen from the countries tax payers. This alone would almost cover the national deficit. If the actual fraud rate was more like 20-30%, which it probably is, then we are looking at 468 - 702 billion being stolen each year as a result. So, if we were to decrease the # of fraudulent claims by 10-15% as a country we would effectively start eliminating our overall national debt, thus increasing the value of the dollar. But in our current situation the national debt continues to increase due mostly to social assistance programs. The fat could be cut in other areas and should be but the biggest chunk of the pie will have to come from social services or our children will have some serious problems in the future.
canine teeth
According to statistics, is the welfare system working or is fraud still prevalent?
Illegal immigrants are the biggest recipients of our welfare fraud problem.
Reply:I found a couple websites you might enjoy reading that are listed below. Here is a quote from one of the below websites:
"Eighteen states had not been keeping statistics on child care fraud, but of them, several responded that the local county agencies administering the services did maintained fraud databases. In those states that did maintain detailed statistics, fraud was discovered in upwards of 69 percent of the investigations conducted with total annual discovered fraud amounts ranging from $10,000 to over $1 million." -UCOWF
Reply:The current welfare/SS/unemployment/medicare/medicad... make up 67% of the Federal governments total spending. If you take into consideration that the Fed recieves about 3.5 trillion in tax revenues a year then 2.34 trillion dollars goes into social assistance programs. (2,340,000,000,000 dollars) if only lets say that on the low end 10% of the total is fraudulent or misused then that is 234 billion dollars that is being stolen from the countries tax payers. This alone would almost cover the national deficit. If the actual fraud rate was more like 20-30%, which it probably is, then we are looking at 468 - 702 billion being stolen each year as a result. So, if we were to decrease the # of fraudulent claims by 10-15% as a country we would effectively start eliminating our overall national debt, thus increasing the value of the dollar. But in our current situation the national debt continues to increase due mostly to social assistance programs. The fat could be cut in other areas and should be but the biggest chunk of the pie will have to come from social services or our children will have some serious problems in the future.
canine teeth
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
